Heatmaps are pretty but inevitably focus attention on where the data is, rather than where it is missing. As an attempt to try to switch the emphasis I have used quadrat mapping - arbitrarily dividing VC55 into a grid and looking at the number of records within each section. A 25x25 grid worked but the the intervals were a bit small and a 10x10 grid is more informative (all VC55 Collembola records to end 2018):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72c70/72c70a9bfb4d518c88f7b0df63a6ae4dc5547599" alt=""
The grid for Orchesella cincta looks like this:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15cd0/15cd07970cebfe4def8e5fc4426f2ae2c3c8b316" alt=""
To make sense of this, I converted the distributions into histograms:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91359/9135972315ba7c8686b7b551b4ef722a0720294a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85533/85533c300f21606a3ada40045c5f17bf63f2c3ae" alt=""
These look pretty similar, but to be sure, I ran some further analysis:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9806/f9806edf2da936490a4064b6c69b89000d786fcb" alt=""
There's a good correlation between the Orchesella cincta distribution and the overall Collembola dataset, and this is statistically significant (p = 2.2e-16). Thus Orchesella cincta is a good benchmark for springtail recording effort (at least in VC55). Phew!
Acknowledgements:
All data Copyright Leicestershire and Rutland Environmental Records Centre.
Data visualization performed using the R platform, v. 3.6.1 (R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org).
J. Cann for assistance with data visualization.