Showing posts with label Lepidocyrtus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lepidocyrtus. Show all posts

Monday, 10 June 2019

Big trouble in Lepidocyrtus

Lepidocyrtus cyaneus"Everything is everywhere but the environment selects"

Early in the twentieth century the Dutch microbiologists Beijerinck and Becking proposed the hypothesis that "Everything is everywhere but the environment selects" to explain the distribution of microorganisms. This has been much debated but it makes a lot of sense for highly mobile organisms that can be blown on the wind. At what scale it stops being true is unclear, but ecological determinism means that for all species, the environment selects which species persist. One of the most important factors in selection is climate, which determines the current distribution of species and will determine how these change in the future. The flora and fauna of Britain bear the signs of restriction by and subsequent repopulation following the last ice age. Not much survived under the ice cap but there were geothermal islands and not all of the UK was glaciated. The inability of springtails to fly limits their spread and repopulation when the ice retreats but their small size and abundance means that they are able to persist in suitable niches in otherwise adverse environments. Thus the present day distribution of springtails carries the historical signature of climate change. A recent paper examines two genera of springtails, Entomobrya and Lepidocyrtus, and reveals not only the impact of glaciation but also present day relationships (Faria, Shaw & Emerson, 2019).

Springtail samples were collected from 98 sites across Britain and the DNA sequence of a region of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene determined and used to establish relationships. The patterns revealed indicate both geographical and genetic relationships in these two genera. Analaysis identified 12 Operational Taxonomic Units (genetic groupings) for Entomobrya and 18 for Lepidocyrtus in Great Britain. Lepidocyrtus richness was significantly lower in glaciated than unglaciated areas, whereas there was no difference for Entomobrya richness. The data reveal evidence for population persistence of Entomobrya (some of our most familiar springtails) OTUs within Great Britain, estimated to extend back at least some 77,000 years.

For me however, the most interesting aspect of this paper is what it says about present day species. For the most part, the recognised UK Entomobrya species (albocincta, intermedia, marginata, multifasciata, nicoleti, nivalis) behave themselves - colour‐pattern morphospecies were generally monophyletic but concealed two or more mtDNA OTUs. However, the correspondence between morphospecies and OTU was less clear for UK Lepidocyrtus species (curvicollis, cyaneus, lanuginosus, lignorum, ruber, violaceus) - 6 morphospecies harbour 18 distinct OTUs. Specimens assigned to the morphospecies Lepidocyrtus cyaneus featured in seven OTUs, and the dominant OTU contained a mix of morphospecies (mainly L. lignorum and L. lanuginosus). Unexpectedly high cryptic species diversity has been noted previously in this genus and together these results suggest that key taxonomic features (mainly distribution of scales, ground colour) may be unreliable indicators of species boundaries. How exactly the genetic diversity of UK Lepidocyrtus species translates into physical variability is unclear, but may go some way to explain the length of time I often spend scratching my head when examining Lepidocyrtus specimens...
 

In response to my enquires, Frans Janssens commented:  
Do not confuse OTU's with species. A species *can* map to several OTU's. ... The fact that "the dominant OTU contained a mix of morphospecies (mainly L. lignorum and L. lanuginosus)" suggests errors have been made in species identification of the specimens, given both species are easily distinguished based on morphology. Example: the specimens IDed as lanuginosus possibly were lignorum specimens with aberration in scale position on legs: such as specimens that lost all scales on legs during specimen handling. Please continue to record Lepidocyrtus based on morphology.

Matthew Shepherd also left an interesting comment: 
"It's not just Lepidocyrtus - many soil animals, especially those with parthenogenesis (females giving birth to more clone females without fertilisation), don't really fit into the concept of a species... One of our commonest mites worldwide, Platynothrus peltifer, has been shown by Alfried Vogler and co-workers to have evolved into 12 global clades whose genes suggest that this species has been reproducing in this way, producing morphologically identical creatures, since the death of the dinosaurs. A 60 million year old species that is effectively actually just one cloned individual! I think that we can still learn a lot from lumping these morpho-types together for recording purposes, whether they're clusters of radiating species or ancient clones. It's still valid and ecologically useful to record brambles, dandelions and eyebrights, even though these are radiating aggregations of species. I think that we will have to just be a bit flexible with the data when we come to analyse it."
  

O’Malley, M.A. (2008) ‘Everything is everywhere: but the environment selects’: ubiquitous distribution and ecological determinism in microbial biogeography. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 39(3), 314-325. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136984860800040X

Faria CMA, Shaw P, Emerson BC. (2019) Evidence for the Pleistocene persistence of Collembola in Great Britain. J Biogeogr. 46: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13610
Abstract: Using two genera of springtail, Lepidocyrtus and Entomobrya (Collembola), we test for genetic signatures of Pleistocene persistence of soil arthropods in Great Britain. A region of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene was sequenced for 1,150 Collembola specimens from the genera Lepidocyrtus and Entomobrya across Great Britain. Individuals were clustered into Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs), and both OTU richness and geographical patterns of genetic variation within OTUs were compared between glaciated and unglaciated areas to identify signatures of OTU persistence through Pleistocene glacial events. Our analyses identified 12 Entomobrya and 18 Lepidocyrtus OTUs in Great Britain. Lepidocyrtus OTU richness was significantly lower in glaciated than unglaciated areas, whereas there was no difference for Entomobrya OTU richness. However, both genera presented clear patterns of geographically disjunct genetic variation and geographically localized diversification of OTUs. Estimated dates for the onset of in situ diversification events indicate population persistence that pre‐dates the Last Glacial Maximum. Patterns of genetic diversity within Collembola OTUs in Great Britain add to a growing body of evidence that elements of the invertebrate fauna have persisted in situ through Pleistocene glacial cycles. Genetic signatures of population persistence in more northern glaciated areas of Great Britain support a hypothesis of geothermal glacial refugia that call for further investigation with other soil mesofaunal taxa.

Wednesday, 22 May 2019

The pitfalls of studying springtails

Lepidocyrtus cyaneus


To get a complete picture of the springtails in an area it's necessary to combine various collection methods, including pitfall trapping. This is not something I have done before but I have been running a pitfall trap for a few days. It collects a wide variety of taxa but since I'm running a dry trap the organisms I don't think I can identify are returned to run free without harm. Several springtails species have turned up so far, including numerous specimens of small (~1mm) Lepidocyrtus. I struggled to identify these until I eventually figured out that they are Lepidocyrtus cyaneus, seemingly the predominant species at present on my collecting site.



Monday, 31 December 2018

28.12.18 Brocks Hill: Lepidocyrtus - feeling the pain

A quick trip to a local wildlife area the relieve the monotony, a big bag of leaf litter - surely this is the true meaning of Christmas. And, like most Christmas presents, the contents of Santas sack turned out to be faintly underwhelming. Dicyrtomina saundersi - lots of them, they're everywhere at present. A single big, bouncy Orchesella villosa. And, inevitably, lots of Lepidocyrtus:

Lepidocyrtus


Every time I feel I'm making progress with Lepidocyrtus I immediately start to go backwards again. After an unproductive morning, I'm tempted to put this one down as Lepidocyrtus lanuginosus because I can see no evidence of scales on the legs or antennae, but frankly, I'm not at all confident. At least I know I'm not alone in struggling with this genus:

Mateos, E., Escuer, P., Buşmachiu, G., Riutort, M., & Álvarez-Presas, M. (2018) Untangling Lepidocyrtus (Collembola, Entomobryidae): new molecular data shed light on the relationships of the European groups. Invertebrate Systematics, 32(3), 639-651. https://doi.org/10.1071/IS17056
A redefinition of European species-groups is proposed based on chaetotaxy:
Lepidocyrtus curvicollis group
Lepidocyrtus lignorum group
Lepidocyrtus pallidus group
Lepidocyrtus lanuginosus group
Lepidocyrtus lusitanicus group

Zhang, B., Chen, T.W., Mateos, E., Scheu, S., & Schaefer, I. (2018) Cryptic species in Lepidocyrtus lanuginosus (Collembola: Entomobryidae) are sorted by habitat type. Pedobiologia, 68, 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2018.03.001
Lepidocyrtus lanuginosus separates into three major genetic lineages with one of these lineages being close to Lepidocyrtus cyaneus.

Anyway, a positive outcome in the end. Although I'm still unclear about the the identity of these specimens, I've seen the future and it's chaetotaxy:

Lepidocyrtus


Tuesday, 10 July 2018

Lepidocyrtus

General characteristics:
Adb4 more twice as long as abd3; most species have blue pigmentation but this is only clearly visible in natural light and easily lost in alcohol-preserved specimens. Presence or absence of scales on legs and antennae are an important character in this group but these can be very difficult to see (especially confirming their absence) so exercise caution. 
Lepidocyrtus Key

Pale species; Th2 not prominent:
  • Lepidocyrtus lanuginosus: predominantly pale with traces of blue pigment on the head, thorax and legs; no scales on the legs or antennae; interocular macrosetae present.
  • Lepidocyrtus lignorum: predominantly pale with faint traces of blue pigment on the head, thorax and legs; scales present on the legs and ant1+ant2, no scales on ant3+ant4 (c.f. L. curvicollis); eyepatch roundish (less elongate than other species); no interocular macrosetae:

Lepidocyrtus

Lepidocyrtus lignorum: angle between head and body relatively straight, >=90 degrees, scales on the 2 basal antennal segments and legs, no scales on ant3 and ant4, eyepatch roundish (less elongate than other species):

Lepidocyrtus lignorum

Lepidocyrtus lignorum antennae





Blue/violet pigmented species; Th2 prominent to varying degrees:

  • Lepidocyrtus curvicollis: a pale species with traces of pigment on the head, thorax and legs; Th2 overhangs the head dorsally - head tucked under thorax; scales are present on the legs, and on ant1-4 (like L. paradoxus).
  • Lepidocyrtus cyaneus: blue pigment on the head, thorax, abdomen and legs (less obvious in artificial light), no scales on legs or antennae. Note that the blue pigment of L. cyaneus can only be seen in descaled specimens as the blue is not an iridisation colour of the scales but an intrinsic colour of the naked (descaled) skin. Interocular macrosetae present.
  • Lepidocyrtus violaceus: strong blue pigment on the head, thorax, abdomen and legs; scales on the legs and ant1+ant2, no scales on ant3+ant4; no interocular macrosetae.
  • Lepidocyrtus paradoxus (absent from UK?): dark body, pale legs; Th2 very prominent, angle between head and body <90 degrees and scales on the 2 basal antennal segments and legs.



Lepidocyrtus cyaneus: blue pigment on the head, thorax, abdomen and legs (less obvious in artificial light), no scales on legs or antennae. Note that the blue pigment of L. cyaneus can only be seen in descaled specimens as the blue is not an iridisation colour of the scales but an intrinsic colour of the naked (descaled) skin. Interocular macrosetae present:

Lepidocyrtus cyaneus



Lepidocyrtus violaceus: strong blue pigment on the head, thorax, abdomen and legs, scales on the legs and on the first (ant1) and second (ant2) segments of the antennae, but NOT on ant3 and ant4:

Lepidocyrtus violaceus

Lepidocyrtus violaceus



Lepidocyrtus paradoxus: angle between head and body < 90 degrees, scales on the 2 basal antennal segments and legs. Photo by Marie Huskens:
Lepidocyrtus paradoxus

Tuesday, 27 February 2018

The problem with scales

Scales are often used as an identification feature for springtails. The problem is, scales are easily lost. Take this specimen of Tomocerus minor:

Tomocerus minor

Tomocerus species are heavily scaled and this gives them their characteristic dark colour. But the scales are easily lost - the left side of the abdomen of this specimen shows the dark scales, but on the right side it looks like a golden coloured animal. Scales in specific locations are a diagnostic feature for many species, e.g. Lepidocyrtus lignorum has scales on the basal segments of the antennae:

Lepidocyrtus lignorum

I use a small paintbrush to manipulate springtails - I find the easiest way to pick them up is with a moist brush. This often dislodges scales, but using a pooter to move springtails is also quite rough. Scales are also commonly lost from specimens preserved in 70% isopropanol. So the answer to the missing scales problem is:

  • If scales are an important identification feature and you can see them, you're a winner.
  • But if you can't see any scales, it doesn't mean they weren't there originally - keep this in mind.