Wednesday, 14 March 2018

Desoria

Desoria - covered in short setae (hairs); simple (unforked) setae by the feet; mucro has four teeth but does not possess a lateral seta, apical tooth is large (c.f. Isotomurus).
Isotoma - long setae on all body segments; mucro has three teeth.
Isotomurus - long setae on abd5+6 only; mucro has four teeth, apical tooth smaller than the others (c.f. Desoria).


Genus Desoria:
Desoria infuscata - very rare, upland sphagnum bogs.
Desoria tigrina - common, widespread. Dorsal plus lateral pigment stripes. Macrosetae on abd5 <0.7 length of adb5. (All UK literature records for 'Isotoma olivacea' are probably Desoria tigrina.)
Desoria trispinata - probable horticultural import. No macrosetae on abd. Looks like Vertagopus arboreus but with blue rather than pale legs. Eight ocelli in a rectangular eyepatch, c.f. four in a square patch for Parisotoma notabilis. Nine setae around the feet c.f. eleven in Isotoma.
Desoria violacea - common, widespread. Dark colour with blue/violet iridescence. Macrosetae on abd5 approximately same length of adb5.


Desoria tigrina
"Desoria tigrina (formerly Isotoma tigrina) is widespread and common, with a tendency towards human-impacted soils or habitats rich in organic matter. Desoria tigrina is light to dark grey or brown (never white, dark blue or violet)."

Desoria tigrina

Desoria tigrina

- No macrosetae
- Ocelli B-D-E aligned
- Mucro with 4 teeth and no lateral seta
- Long setae on Abd5 <0.7 length of Abd5



Desoria trispinata - Photo Marie Huskens:

Desoria trispinata



Desoria violacea:

Desoria violacea




Hypogastruridae

These are the ones that got away - very difficult group to identify to species level:


11.03.18 SK508071 ~1mm in Beech leaf litter:
Hypogastruridae
Roundish mouthcone, 2 anal spines.








Tuesday, 13 March 2018

Isotomurus palustris

Desoria - covered in short setae (hairs)
Isotoma - long setae on all body segments
Isotomurus - long setae on abd5+6 only


The "Isotomurus palustris" group contain some of the commonest and most widespread springtails in the UK. In Isotomurus palustris sensu stricto, the central stripe is prominent and unbroken except at the dorsal margins of tergites, with a mottled pattern on the flanks.

Isotomurus palustris


Ocelli:
Isotomurus palustris - Ocelli


Claw:
Isotomurus palustris - Claw

Saturday, 10 March 2018

The Brush Off

Brushes Some species of springtail can reliably be found in certain environments, e.g. Anurida maritima on the seashore, Entomobrya nivalis climbing up vegetation and grazing algae from tree trunks. Entomobrya nivalis is a bogey species for me. Although it is "very common", I've never found it! So I armed myself with my trusty paintbrush and a pot of invisible paint and went off to give the fruit trees in the garden a couple of coats of nothing but air. Getting into all the cracks and under bark flakes I could see the springtails raining down into the white plastic tub I was holding against the tree, and then, since it was flipping cold, I took them indoors to search for the elusive nivalis (more on paintbrushes here).


The first thing I found, fairly predictably, were lots of Entomobrya intermedia. Unlike E. nivalis, E. intermedia is truly common in these parts, but this was an encouraging start.

Entomobrya intermedia
Entomobrya intermedia

One of the nice things about Entomobrya species is that they can fairly easily be identified from dorsal pigmentation patterns, and thus from photographs. E. intermedia has a characteristic broken “U” (the corners are missing) on abd.5/6 and a “W” across the top of abd.4. So far so good. After wading through all the intermedia, next up was a single specimen of Entomobrya multifasciata:

Entomobrya multifasciata

This species is characterised by the pair of triangular patches of pigment pointing forwards on the posterior margin of abd.4. Unfortunately it can be confused with female Entomobrya nigrocincta (a sexually dimorphic springtail), but I'm confident about this one and also very pleased as this is a new record for my garden. Sadly, at this point it all went a bit pear shaped. Sorting through the smaller specimens, I started to find a lot of these:

Orchesella cincta juvenile Orchesella cincta subadult

This tripped me up and caused a lot of head scratching trying to match up abdominal pigmentation patters with, well anything really. I'd become fixated on Entomobrya and failed to consider the other possibilities - rookie error. It wasn't until I found an adult and with assistance from Frans Janssens that the penny dropped:

Orchesella cincta
Orchesella cincta

Unlike the juveniles I'd been finding, adult O. cincta are much darker - males are completely black (except for the white bands), females are less black and more spotted/patterned. This male is a bit battered and has lost quite a few scales and hairs so it's not a typical specimen but still quite recognisable. What I'd overlooked was that Entomobrya have 4 antennal segments, in Orchesella ant.1 and ant.2 appear to be divided so there appear to be 6 antennal segments (have another look at the juveniles above). The other problem is that all the instars of O. cincta appear different to each other - the first one above is a juvenile, the second one (with more dark pigment) is a subadult, but if you look at the antennae, you can see that they are not Entomobrya. Once again thanks to Frans Janssens for sorting me out.





Not a bad return on a pot of invisible paint! I may apply for Sky Arts Invisible Artist of the Year.


Thursday, 8 March 2018

Neelidae: Megalothorax minimus

The taxonomic Class Collembola is divided into four Orders:
  • Poduromorpha
  • Entomobryomorpha
  • Symphypleona
The fourth Order, Neelipleona, is contested but widely accepted. Only three species are currently known occur in the UK:

Family Neelidae
Genus Neelides Caroli 1912
Neelides minutus: Probably rare, overlooked as tiny.

Genus Neelus Folsom, 1896
Neelus murinus: Moderately common, mainly in caves.

Genus Megalothorax Willem 1900
Megalothorax minimus: Widespread, probably common but overlooked as tiny.


This specimen of Megalothorax minimus was obtained by floating springtails from a garden soil sample. It has the characteristic stubby antenna of Megalothorax minimus but should be labelled Megalothorax minimus sensu lato as full identification of M. minimus requires scanning electron microscope level images. This is an extremely common species but overlooked because of its size (and difficulty of identification).


Megalothorax minimus?


Megalothorax minimus
Furcula visible.


Megalothorax minimus
Head.

Wednesday, 7 March 2018

Why care about springtails? - Soil Fertility



Culliney, T. W. (2013) Role of arthropods in maintaining soil fertility. Agriculture, 3(4), 629-659:
"In terms of species richness, arthropods may represent as much as 85% of the soil fauna. They comprise a large proportion of the meso- and macrofauna of the soil. Within the litter/soil system, five groups are chiefly represented: Isopoda, Myriapoda, Insecta, Acari, and Collembola, the latter two being by far the most abundant and diverse. Arthropods function on two of the three broad levels of organization of the soil food web: they are plant litter transformers or ecosystem engineers. Litter transformers fragment, or comminute, and humidify ingested plant debris, which is deposited in faeces for further decomposition by micro-organisms, and foster the growth and dispersal of microbial populations. The comminuted plant matter in faeces presents an increased surface area to attack by micro-organisms, which, through the process of mineralization, convert its organic nutrients into simpler, inorganic compounds available to plants. Ecosystem engineers alter soil structure, mineral and organic matter composition, and hydrology. The burrowing by arthropods, particularly the subterranean network of tunnels and galleries that comprise termite and ant nests, improves soil porosity to provide adequate aeration and water-holding capacity below ground, facilitate root penetration, and prevent surface crusting and erosion of topsoil. Also, the movement of particles from lower horizons to the surface by ants and termites aids in mixing the organic and mineral fractions of the soil. The faeces of arthropods are the basis for the formation of soil aggregates and humus, which physically stabilize the soil and increase its capacity to store nutrients."

"As part of the mesofauna, the microarthropods comprise the important middle links of soil food webs, serving, in their role as both predator and prey, to channel energy from the soil microflora and microfauna to the macrofauna on higher trophic levels. ... The diet of Collembola is of considerable breadth, including moss protonema, bacteria, fungal hyphae and spores, algae, protozoans, arthropod faeces, pollen, decaying plant materials and humus, other Collembola (living or dead), and stored products, and species are divided between those that masticate their food and those that are fluid feeders. However, the majority of species are primarily or largely fungivorous. ... Comminution of plant litter is brought about largely by the feeding activity of saprophagous animals, and, during passage through the digestive system, is accompanied by catabolic changes. The unassimilated residue from the communitive and catabolic processes is excreted as faeces, typically smaller in size and of different chemical composition than the ingested food. The plant matter passing out in faeces also presents an increased surface area to attack by micro-organisms. A significant amount of plant material may be involved. For example, as much as 20% of total annual litter input typically may be processed by the feeding activity of Collembola. ... In habitats, in which earthworms are absent or rare, such as the acidic more soils of coniferous forests, Collembola may assume a much greater role in the physical breakdown of organic matter. ... Collembolan grazing on fungi can result in increased mobilization of available N and Ca, with implications for nutrient availability in particular environments, such as acidic forest soils, in which large nutrient pools tend to be immobilized in stores of accumulated organic matter. ... Significant amounts of K+, PO4 3−, N, Na+, and Ca2+ may be stored in soil arthropod (Collembola, Oribatida, Isopoda, and Diplopoda) biomass, these animals constituting an important nutrient pool in the soil, which temporarily immobilizes ions and prevents them from being leached. Arthropod remains also may constitute a significant portion of the total pool of elements, particularly Ca, found in soil, rivalling that of the living standing crop [139]. Nutrients unassimilated from food by the soil fauna may become concentrated in faeces in available form. For example, Teuben & Verhoef found the faeces of Collembola to contain more than 40 times more NO3− nitrogen than their food (fungi and algae) and concluded that the contribution of faeces increased nitrate availability in the forest floor by a factor of 2.4. Biotic pedoturbation refers to the displacement or mixing of soil material through the actions of organisms [204]. In general, the mesofauna are not considered important in this process because they are too small to move most soil particles (although some Collembola and oribatid mites are said to make active “microtunnels” in the soil matrix); these animals instead rely on existing cracks and crevices, and the channels and spaces created by the larger fauna to aid their mobility within the soil. ... The faecal pellets of Collembola readily agglomerate and form water-stable aggregates in soil. Strong interparticle cohesive forces within faecal pellets contribute to their persistence. Faeces of Collembola and other microarthropods constitute a significant proportion of the humic material in developing sand dunes, and are thought to contribute to dune consolidation and stabilization by binding sand grains into larger aggregates. The faecal pellets of Collembola are central to the formation and persistence of the microstructure in some arctic, alpine, and other weakly developed soils. The volume of faeces contributed may be considerable. For example, collembolan populations, at densities typical of forest soils, were estimated to produce around 175 cc of faecal pellets m−2 annually, equivalent to the formation of a soil layer of roughly 0.2 mm in depth"



Monday, 5 March 2018

Isotoma viridis

Desoria - covered in short setae (hairs)
Isotoma - long setae on all body segments
Isotomurus - long setae on abd5+6 only


Isotoma viridis: Green pigment (variable):

Isotoma viridis


Isotoma = Ocelli CDE in a straight line, Abd5 & 6 separate:

Isotoma viridis - Ocelli


Single pair of 'teeth' on the thickened apical edge of the manubrium (c.f. 2 pairs = I. anglicana):

Isotoma viridis


Saturday, 3 March 2018

Antennae - why do they break?

One of the characteristics of Tomocerus is that the third antennal segment (Ant3) is elongated. Ant1 & 2 have scales, Ant3 & 4 are not scaled and have an annular structure:

Tomocerus minor

I've been examining a lot of Tomocerus specimens recently - as this is such a common genus, it's hard not to. One of the frustrations is that the antennae of preserved Tomocerus are almost invariably damaged. I was wondering why this was, and the thought led me down a rabbit hole of zoological research...

Hexapods possess one of two types of antennae, segmented or annulated (Imms, A.D. (1939) Memoirs: on the antennal musculature in insects and other arthropods. Journal of Cell Science, 2(322), 273-320). Springtails typically have segmented antennae while higher hexapods such as insects have annulated antennae. For both types, the first two antennal segments contain both extrinsic muscles (anchored outside the antenna) and intrinsic muscles, contained completely within the antenna.

However, there is variation within the Collembolla, and in families such as the Sminthuridae, and the genera Tomocerus and Orchesella, the terminal one or two segments have an annular structure which is devoid of muscles, and thus fragile and prone to breakage. Did this evolve to frustrate people who study springtails? Presumably not! But why would a springtail need such a hybrid antennal structure? Springtails are on the diet of many predators and a significant proportion of unsuccessful attacks by the predator Notiophilus biguttatus (Carabidae) on Orchesella cincta results in damage to the antennae (Ernsting, G., & Fokkema, D.S. (1982. Antennal damage and regeneration in springtails (Collembola) in relation to predation. Netherlands Journal of zoology, 33(4), 476-484). Being able to sacrifice part of your antennae (and regenerate then in subsequent moults - antennal damage results in an increase in moulting frequency) is better than being eaten.

Johnson's organ, an acoustic sensory organ in the second antennal segment, is absent in springtails (Imms, A.D. (1940) On growth processes in the antennae of insects. Quart. J. Microsc. Soc, 81, 585-593), presumably meaning that while they may be able to detect vibrations, springtails are essentially deaf (Goepfert, M.C., & Hennig, R.M. (2016) Hearing in insects. Annual review of entomology, 61, 257-276). With springtails, it's all about the pheromones.

Thursday, 1 March 2018

Tomocerus minor

Tomocerus minor

Tomocerus minor is an extremely common and widespread species, up to ~4.5mm long. As will all all Tomocerus species, the body is heavily covered in dark scales, but these can be easily lost in preserved specimens, changing the appearance to a golden colour:

Tomocerus minor

In T. minor, the empodium of the foot is about two-thirds the length of the claw:

Tomocerus minor - Claw

The spines on the inner side of the dens are tridentate, a highly characteristic feature which makes it impossible to confuse with any other species:

Tomocerus minor - Dens

Males can be recognized by the presence of a genital plate with circumgenital setae, absent in females, as seen here.